Waverforce，感谢你不断回应来陈述及反驳我的观点，辛苦了。你的意思是,给民联两年多的执政时间不够改良州的施政？那么民联应否以这个为理由要求人民再给它5年还是50年还是500年的时间?那到时候，我们是否成了落后国?
那你又看看世界上诸多先进民主国家，人家是致力改良制度还是把执政不力的责任推给前朝的执政党?在执政州属的时候已经学得一身推卸责任的‘武艺’，那么有朝一日掌管政权的时候是否又会说:5年执政时间太短了,我们没来得及改善机制，再给我50年吧。
民联在雪州县市议员名单混乱不堪的事件上所捅的乱子是因为民联掌权一方对人选名单诸多意见,为满足各路门派而展延公布县市议员名单，是他们自己并未遵循身为州政府及其政党的守则，自身的劣根性在作祟，何来是遴选制度有问题？问题根源看来来自民联里头的人士自身吧。搪塞之词朗朗上口，何须再为他们多作背诵？
在另一篇文章里的提问中，您批如果每天只是维持着一个立场即是伪中立。那么,天天都换立场的人就叫‘很中立’？立场，是代表了一个人的中心思想，发自其思维,经过判断后作出的见解。试问一个人在一个事件当中能有多个立场吗？那不是中立,那应叫做摇摆几头草。
新闻本身不应有立场？难道中立不算是立场？
我在文章里头是说, 读者有权反映其看法，而媒体工作者也可提出自身观点。另外，也希望大家尊重别人发表意见的权利，并且强调凡事皆有正反面，立场常有对立的情况，没必要恶意斥责持着相反立场的人。
但依照你的解读，你仍然认为发表自身意见的读者们，皆是该报的重炮手，却从来没想过那是读者们的看法。你如此藐视读者，藐视别人发言的空间，在你文章中恶意中伤投稿发言的读者，看得出来你立场绝非中立。而且，对我文章的中心想法并没有深入的了解。
我并非刻意与你抬扛，并衷心感谢你的见解，让我看见有趣的思考模式。同时，也感谢独立新闻在线，因为刊登文章可能也会被解读成伪中立，辛苦贵媒体了。
9 comments:
不就是嘛， 现在连董董都明白默认了前朝的遗害, 或许也过的不太好的缘故， （还未能说遗害， 因为联邦政府还在加害），那民联也不该太坦白， 太直接， 就跳入总结。
把这么广大，这么深远的遗害（可说是全部的不平不公合约， 枷锁）都指向前朝， 未免太儿戏了。
应该把话说清楚些， 尊重人民的知道的权利， 起码开调查委员会，把事情弄个清楚， 算算账， 看看过程， 再来个总清单， 该送去娜的就送去哪, 以后就别再提了。也不必为星洲有没有报道担心.
中立立场, 肯定非董董莫属. 董董立场坚定. 蔡老大, 从升官, 到当不太光彩的主角, 再回魂, 被打压到打压, 都多多支持.
对于马华更加不离不弃, 虽知道马华为全马带来了比较深的影响,不再抱有希望, 当时还是以往如夕, 爱护有加. - 坚定!
对于前朝签下的不平的水供和约, 虽未当权, (好歹也挂名当家支持签约), 即能高调时时为民着想, 却又能支持联邦政府的区区三亿无息贷款给水供公司, 立场明显中立, 从不摇摆几头,而且还照顾各方权利一点不损, 能力甚高， 令人折服！
I dun believe you really are a believer in freedom of press and free of speech. Of all your blogs, 90% are attacking the PR coalition. Even the 10% about BN is trying to paint a good picture.
The most you are the running dog of corrupted BN. I dare you to write more to expose BN's dirty linen for the past 50 years.Give BN and PR 50-50 coverage, and I will call you fair and square ! If you dare not, then just shut the fcuk up. I have enough of your bullshit based on your so called freedom of bullshit speech. Podah!!
keep your bullshit in your own blogs,nobody will bother what you shit inside your pants but don't try to dirty our eyes in merdeka review. Merdeka Review belongs to the good public, not your kind of BN running dogs!
I am not a supporter of PR ( I mean not yet, until they show me that they are good government), But I definitely hate UMNO and the BN.... I suffered my life for 50 years under the UMNO regime with the running dogs of MCA....Fcuk !!
Read the Excerpts from Malaysia today 15.7.2010/ written by raja petra kamaruddin, and go fly kite!
Quote "Umno may be a Malay party. But it is not the Malays who give Umno that power to rule. It is the ‘pendatang’ Chinese and Indians and second-class citizens from East Malaysia who have been colonised by Umno. They keep Umno in power. And they allow Umno to insult them on top of that.
"Bodoh punya Cina, India dan orang Sabah dan Sarawak. At least prostitutes get paid for getting screwed. You get screwed and you pay for it. You are worse than prostitutes. I have no sympathy for these types of Malaysians. And these are the people who complain the most. Stupid!"unquote
I guess you must be one of those bodoh punya Cina............
Markko, actually i love to see jxtong'S writings in both malaysiakini & merdekareview.
keep their bullshits in their blogs? why?
let them expose their mca thinking in public and get a good one through feedbacks from other readers, that's the way we kick them hard in their mca butt.
Alright, comrade, I hope you will keep on kicking their butts. For me, no eye see. My blood shoots up when I read their bullshit. It's not good for an old man with HBP like me. I still want to live to witness the downfall of BeEnd( Will end in GE13), M-死-A ( sure die one ),Gala-"Kan" (Hokkien word for Fcuk", and M-I-SEE(only see money) in GE13. Cheers!
Markko said...
I dun believe you really are a believer in freedom of press and free of speech. Of all your blogs, 90% are attacking the PR coalition. Even the 10% about BN is trying to paint a good picture.
====
Believe in freedom of press does not mean your writings must be 50% support BN and another 50% support PR.
I more believe in freedom of telling truth, where my blog (nkkhoo.com) writings are 90% in condemning BN and 10% in condemning PR.
Regards,
nkkhoo.com
nkkhoo said:
"Believe in freedom of press does not mean your writings must be 50% support BN and another 50% support PR."
-------------------------------
NK, I applaud your effort and admire your courage. Please continue to do so if you are telling (i prefer to use the word 'exposing" or to "reveal" )the truth, whether it is for BeEnd or for PR.
Just to advise that please do not take the 50-50 at its literal meaning. I'll be damn if i meant someone 'must' give 50-50 coverage to BeEnd & PR in his writing. Actually, what I meant was that if one truly believes in freedom of Press, then one must also be able to speak without fear or favor.He must be able to maintain a balance ( 50-50 ) between favor and without fear.
Take Sin Chew for example, on one hand, they boost about their freedom of Press on reporting PR's wrong doings. On the other hand, they shrunk their balls voluntarily when dealing with the mongolian girl and the submarine case.
Regards and please continue with your good work.
Hi Markko,
Our mainstream papers like Sin Chew, Star and sometimes Malaysiakini also are practicing selective reporting. Many letters to them are thrashed into rubbish bins.
My blog condemns BN more than PR because 53-year old BN is more evils than PR.
Regards,
nkkhoo.com
why mca
Post a Comment